Statistics & Truth [by CR Rao]:
RedCross hires local food contractors to supply rice, salt, water to N unknown survived victims of a recent Earthquake.
The bill shows they supply quantities R, S, W, resp, per day.
Assume average daily consumption per person be r, s, w resp.
To verify any cheating of overbill by contractors:
R/r = S/s = W/w = N
Friday, 5 April 2013
Thursday, 4 April 2013
GM ≦ AM Trick
"General Manager smaller than Assistant Manager"
Put 27 cubes (Length =a, Width=b, Height =c), inside a big Cube of side (a+b+c), can't fill the big Cube completely.
$latex 27abc leq (a+b+c)^{3} $
$latex sqrt [3] {abc} leq frac {a+b+c}{3}$
Generalized:
GM ≦AM
$latex sqrt [n] {x_1 x_2 x_3 dots x_n} leq frac {x_1+x_2+x_3...+xn}{n}$
GM = Geometric Mean
AM = Arithmetic Mean
$latex mbox {Application}$
$latex mbox {Prove:} : 1003^{2005} > 2005!$
Solution: use 'Promote' technique to general case:
$latex sqrt[n] {1.23...n} < frac {1+2...+n}{n}$
Let n=2005
$latex sqrt[2005] {1.23...2005} < frac {1+2...+2005}{2005}$
$latex sqrt[2005] {2005!} < frac {(2005)(2006)/2}{2005}$
$latex sqrt[2005] {2005!} <1003$
$latex 1003^{2005} > 2005! $ [QED]
Put 27 cubes (Length =a, Width=b, Height =c), inside a big Cube of side (a+b+c), can't fill the big Cube completely.
$latex 27abc leq (a+b+c)^{3} $
$latex sqrt [3] {abc} leq frac {a+b+c}{3}$
Generalized:
GM ≦AM
$latex sqrt [n] {x_1 x_2 x_3 dots x_n} leq frac {x_1+x_2+x_3...+xn}{n}$
GM = Geometric Mean
AM = Arithmetic Mean
$latex mbox {Application}$
$latex mbox {Prove:} : 1003^{2005} > 2005!$
Solution: use 'Promote' technique to general case:
$latex sqrt[n] {1.23...n} < frac {1+2...+n}{n}$
Let n=2005
$latex sqrt[2005] {1.23...2005} < frac {1+2...+2005}{2005}$
$latex sqrt[2005] {2005!} < frac {(2005)(2006)/2}{2005}$
$latex sqrt[2005] {2005!} <1003$
$latex 1003^{2005} > 2005! $ [QED]
Cute Geometry Proof
Prove: Any line L will cut a circle at most 2 points:
Factorize C(x,y) : (x+iy) (x-iy) = 1 in the complex plane.
So C = {L1} U {L2}
where L1 and L2 are two lines
Let circle C (x,y) be unit circle defined by
C(x,y) : x² + y² = 1
Factorize C(x,y) : (x+iy) (x-iy) = 1 in the complex plane.
So C = {L1} U {L2}
where L1 and L2 are two lines
L1= x+iy
L2= x - iy
L1 and L2 intersect at origin (0,0):
x+ iy = x-iy
We know that any line L will cut L1 at most 1 point, and L2 at most 1 point
Therefore,
L cuts the circle C at most (1+1=) 2 points. [QED]
Plato Solids
Why only 5 Plato solids ?
Plato Solid is: Regular Polyhedron 正多面体
Only 5 solids possible:
Tetrahedron (n,m)=(3,3) 正四面体
Hexahedron (or Cube) (n,m)=(4,3) 正六面体
Octahedron (n,m)=(3,4)正八面体
Dodecahedron (n,m)=(5,3)正十二面体
Icosahedron (n,m)=(3,5)正二十面体
Proof:
Since each Edge (E) is common to 2 Faces (F)
=> n Faces counts double the edges
nF = 2E ...(1)
Since each Vertex has m Edges, each Edge has 2 end-points (Vertex).
=> m Vertex counts double the edges
mV = 2E ...(2)
(1) : E= n/2 F
(2): V= 2/m. E = n/m. F
(1) & (2) into Euler Formula: V -E + F = 2
(n/m. F) - (n/2.F) + F = 2
F.(2m + 2n - mn) = 4m
Since F>0 , m>0
=> (2m + 2n - mn) >0
=> - (mn -2n -2m) > 0
=> (mn -2n -2m) < 0
=> (mn -2m -2n) + 4 < 4
=> (m- 2).(n -2 ) < 4
Substitute into (1),(2):
F= 4 8 20 6 12
E= 6 12 30 12 30
V= 4 6 12 8 20
Tetrahedron 正四面体
(n,m)=(3,3) => (F,E ,V)=(4,6,4)
Cube or Hexahedron 正六面体(n,m)=(4,3) => (6,12,8)
Octahedron 正八面体
(n,m)=(3,4) => (8,12,6)
Dodecahedron 正十二面体
(n, m)=(5,3)=> (12,30,20)
Icosahedron 正二十面体
(n,m)=(3,5) => (20, 30,12)
The most complicated and the prettiest symmetric solid is:
Icosahedron 正二十面体
Icosahedron is the shape of the incurable HiV viruses.
Icosahedron is the symmetry of Galois Group, proved the unsolvable Quintic equations have no radical roots.
Plato Solid is: Regular Polyhedron 正多面体
- Each Face is n-sided polygon
- Each Vertex is common to m-edges (m ≥ 3)
Only 5 solids possible:
Tetrahedron (n,m)=(3,3) 正四面体
Hexahedron (or Cube) (n,m)=(4,3) 正六面体
Octahedron (n,m)=(3,4)正八面体
Dodecahedron (n,m)=(5,3)正十二面体
Icosahedron (n,m)=(3,5)正二十面体
Proof:
Since each Edge (E) is common to 2 Faces (F)
=> n Faces counts double the edges
nF = 2E ...(1)
Since each Vertex has m Edges, each Edge has 2 end-points (Vertex).
=> m Vertex counts double the edges
mV = 2E ...(2)
(1) : E= n/2 F
(2): V= 2/m. E = n/m. F
(1) & (2) into Euler Formula: V -E + F = 2
(n/m. F) - (n/2.F) + F = 2
F.(2m + 2n - mn) = 4m
Since F>0 , m>0
=> (2m + 2n - mn) >0
=> - (mn -2n -2m) > 0
=> (mn -2n -2m) < 0
=> (mn -2m -2n) + 4 < 4
=> (m- 2).(n -2 ) < 4
(m,n) only 5 possibilities:
n= 3 3 3 4 5
m=3 4 5 3 3
Substitute into (1),(2):
F= 4 8 20 6 12
E= 6 12 30 12 30
V= 4 6 12 8 20
Tetrahedron 正四面体
(n,m)=(3,3) => (F,E ,V)=(4,6,4)
Cube or Hexahedron 正六面体(n,m)=(4,3) => (6,12,8)
Octahedron 正八面体
(n,m)=(3,4) => (8,12,6)
Dodecahedron 正十二面体
(n, m)=(5,3)=> (12,30,20)
Icosahedron 正二十面体
(n,m)=(3,5) => (20, 30,12)
The most complicated and the prettiest symmetric solid is:
Icosahedron 正二十面体
Icosahedron is the shape of the incurable HiV viruses.
Icosahedron is the symmetry of Galois Group, proved the unsolvable Quintic equations have no radical roots.
Tuesday, 2 April 2013
Maxwell Equation: Symmetry
Maxwell Equation
Maxwell boldy derived from Faraday experimental results by symmetry to get the Maxwell Equation for Electro-Magnetic Fields:
1) rot E = -1/c ∂H/∂t
div H = 0
By symmetry (swap E <-> H )
2) rot H = +1/c ∂E/∂t
div E = 0
Note:
E = Electric Field
H= Magnetic Field
c = Speed of light
Maxwell boldy derived from Faraday experimental results by symmetry to get the Maxwell Equation for Electro-Magnetic Fields:
1) rot E = -1/c ∂H/∂t
div H = 0
By symmetry (swap E <-> H )
2) rot H = +1/c ∂E/∂t
div E = 0
Note:
E = Electric Field
H= Magnetic Field
c = Speed of light
Double-Entry Accounting = Algebraic 'Module'
Accounting Double-Entry Algebraic Structure: Module
Double-entry Accounting forms a structure Module Rⁿ, with scalars from an Abelian Unity Ring Z: (positive=credit, negative = debit).
Note: Change Vector Space's scalar over Field to over Ring => Module's scalar is over Ring.
Double-entry Accounting forms a structure Module Rⁿ, with scalars from an Abelian Unity Ring Z: (positive=credit, negative = debit).
Note: Change Vector Space's scalar over Field to over Ring => Module's scalar is over Ring.
Is '0' Natural Number?
Why '0' is not Natural (Counting) Number (N)?
A famous Polish Mathematician is counting 10 coins which his wife has given him. He never arrives at 10.
His wife sees how he counts: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ..., 9
Note: to avoid confusion: N* = N \ {0}
A famous Polish Mathematician is counting 10 coins which his wife has given him. He never arrives at 10.
His wife sees how he counts: 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 ..., 9
Note: to avoid confusion: N* = N \ {0}
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)